Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Post your Older booksby Oldenginerod Today at 5:40 pm
» Jim Walkers FireBee - This is going to be fun
by rsv1cox Today at 5:11 pm
» Revivng Some Childhood Classics
by rsv1cox Today at 4:48 pm
» Help Pee Wee tank cap .020
by MauricioB Today at 4:33 pm
» Ball - Socket Joints
by Ken Cook Today at 3:06 pm
» A little nostalgia…
by MauricioB Today at 2:32 pm
» A new useful transport vehicle
by davidll1984 Today at 10:32 am
» TAPLIN TWIN 7ccm
by grant.symes Today at 3:29 am
» **VOTE-ON-THE-NEXT-COX-ENGINE-OF-THE-MONTH** (May 2024)
by GallopingGhostler Today at 12:09 am
» Tired of it all…
by roddie Yesterday at 11:09 pm
» Roddie-Rigger.. a 2005 original design
by roddie Yesterday at 10:27 pm
» Science and Mechanics magazine's "Playboy" 14' plywood runabout plans.. circa 1950's
by roddie Yesterday at 9:30 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
Interesting comparison
Page 1 of 1
Re: Interesting comparison
Imitation's the sincerest form of flattery Andrew.
John Goddard- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2447
Join date : 2011-11-24
Age : 59
Location : Leyton North East London
Re: Interesting comparison
I saw that in this mornings email from Hobby King, there's no mystery, Hobby King used to call it a Seniorita. I also think its the very same 'RTF' that Sig imports and sells.
Re: Interesting comparison
Mark Boesen wrote:................... I also think its the very same 'RTF' that Sig imports and sells.
Initially, I thought so too, but SIG doesn't appear to list the Seniorita as an ARF --- it still is carried as a kit, however.
Re: Interesting comparison
Last edited by Mark Boesen on Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Re: Interesting comparison
Mark Boesen wrote:yep, did some surfing after my post, i noticed Sig no longer sells this version, but still think its from the same factory as Sig imports all their RTF/ARF planes.
Yes, I completely agree.
That was my somewhat hidden agenda, i.e., SIG provided the design and likely paid for the construction and setup of the building jigs and cutting files, and now the plane is being offered at a price significantly below what SIG would need to be profitable. It makes it tough for a US company to compete in the ARF market with their own design.
The SIG planes are hard to beat --- the Kadet is certainly no exception.
Re: Interesting comparison
AGREED !!!!
My MK 1: The hardest-flown, most-tortured plane in my livery! Now awaiting it's 4th rebuild after an unfortunate glide-towing incident. I'd extended it's span by two rib bays, added a bomb drop/tow hook release, and made the tail feathers removable to make it more travel-friendly.
The extra wingspan allowed it to do a "trick" that was almost totally unappreciated by everyone but me: If I carefully slowed it to the ragged edge of stall, I could fly it around the field, slapping it's rudder from side-to-side with no affect on it's track. The high angle of attack caused the fuselage to almost totally block the little rudder, but control could be instantly regained with a burst of power, or a punch of down elevator.
Intending to fly it places no other R/C plane had been, I named it "Mud Dabber"...after the way my grandma pronounced the name of the little dirt-packing wasps.
Cross-Country Fund Raiser for United Way in 1982
Banner and flag towing at Airport 4th of July Cook Out
My first baby-steps at aerial photography after taking off it's "training wheel", making it a tail-dragger:
And then, there was that glider-towing incident...
Kim- Top Poster
-
Posts : 8533
Join date : 2011-09-06
Location : South East Missouri
Re: Interesting comparison
I have a Kadet Seinorita EP ARF NIB when Nitro Planes was closing them out a few years back. It in fact has Sig blacked out on the box and in the instructions so these are either rejects that Sig would not purchase or Sig was in dire straights and couldn't afford to sit on inventory. The factory in China did what it did to relieve inventory.
Jason_WI- Top Poster
-
Posts : 3123
Join date : 2011-10-09
Age : 48
Location : Neenah, WI
Re: Interesting comparison
Kim, you sir are a legend! way cool!
I think the Mk. I and probably Mk. II and the later ones flew so well in part to the high lift flat bottom airfoil. One of my 'things' was to get'er up to 250-300' and kill throttle, I once had a 2:45 dead stick/glide catching a couple thermals.
Looking at your photos i wish i hadn't bashed mine.
I think the Mk. I and probably Mk. II and the later ones flew so well in part to the high lift flat bottom airfoil. One of my 'things' was to get'er up to 250-300' and kill throttle, I once had a 2:45 dead stick/glide catching a couple thermals.
Looking at your photos i wish i hadn't bashed mine.
Similar topics
» Older Brothers
» Cox/Aurora Fokker D7's - It's going to be an interesting comparison
» Power Comparison
» Comparison between old and new SPI method?
» Off Topic Comparison of old and new RC receivers
» Cox/Aurora Fokker D7's - It's going to be an interesting comparison
» Power Comparison
» Comparison between old and new SPI method?
» Off Topic Comparison of old and new RC receivers
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum