Log in
Search
Latest topics
» **VOTE-ON-THE-NEXT-COX-ENGINE-OF-THE-MONTH** (May 2024)by 1/2A Nut Yesterday at 10:23 pm
» A prototype Cox Reed-valve marine engine
by F4D Phantom II Yesterday at 7:00 pm
» World's largest weathervane
by Cox International Yesterday at 5:51 pm
» Jim Walkers FireBee - This is going to be fun
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 5:27 pm
» Here we go again... another Lawn-Boy
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 6:50 am
» Norvel Needle Needed
by Greenman38633 Yesterday at 4:02 am
» My Cox .049 Marine inboard engine
by 1/2A Nut Wed May 08, 2024 11:41 pm
» Jim Walker Firebaby
by rsv1cox Wed May 08, 2024 7:26 pm
» Roddie-Rigger.. a 2005 original design
by roddie Wed May 08, 2024 7:04 pm
» music vids.. some of your favorites
by HalfaDave Wed May 08, 2024 6:55 pm
» Help Pee Wee tank cap .020
by rdw777 Wed May 08, 2024 1:30 pm
» Revivng Some Childhood Classics
by getback Wed May 08, 2024 8:21 am
Cox Engine of The Month
Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
Page 1 of 1
Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
Hi,
I know, the price is much too expensive, but it's a basis, and people have the "make an offer option".
But, as a beginner, my first question is : which model is it really ?
I thank you all !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131719273553?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
I know, the price is much too expensive, but it's a basis, and people have the "make an offer option".
But, as a beginner, my first question is : which model is it really ?
I thank you all !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131719273553?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
hikikomori89- Bronze Member
- Posts : 56
Join date : 2015-10-10
Another question, same...
Is that really a "black widow" ?
Thank you !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131712936549?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
Thank you !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131712936549?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
hikikomori89- Bronze Member
- Posts : 56
Join date : 2015-10-10
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
hikikomori89 wrote:Hi,
I know, the price is much too expensive, but it's a basis, and people have the "make an offer option".
But, as a beginner, my first question is : which model is it really ?
I thank you all !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131719273553?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
It is not a Babe Bee engine. What you have there is a 'Spook' engine. click on the link below and scroll just past half way down and it is there. Just below the engine in the blister pack. Hope this helps.
http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/cox_frameset.htm
NEW222- Top Poster
- Posts : 3892
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 45
Location : oakbank, mb
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
hikikomori89 wrote:Is that really a "black widow" ?
Thank you !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131712936549?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
To me, yes it appears to be a late model Black Widow, Estes era I believe. Plastic backplate gives it away. However, I am not 100% sure if they used the red spinner then though, but I am not 100% sure. Mine came with just an un-anodized spinner and tank.
NEW222- Top Poster
- Posts : 3892
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 45
Location : oakbank, mb
Thanx a lot !
Thank you for those precious informations !
hikikomori89- Bronze Member
- Posts : 56
Join date : 2015-10-10
Then my price for the Spook is about OK ?
That Spook engine seems quite rare ?
If i get 50 € I will be happy, I know that it is not THAT rare ;-)
If i get 50 € I will be happy, I know that it is not THAT rare ;-)
hikikomori89- Bronze Member
- Posts : 56
Join date : 2015-10-10
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
NEW222 wrote:hikikomori89 wrote:Is that really a "black widow" ?
Thank you !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131712936549?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
To me, yes it appears to be a late model Black Widow, Estes era I believe. Plastic backplate gives it away. However, I am not 100% sure if they used the red spinner then though, but I am not 100% sure. Mine came with just an un-anodized spinner and tank.
At that time Estes was slappin' anything in the packages
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
It's possible, could be what I call a change over BW, It could also be a pre-estes BW. They changed over to the plastic back plate a little after 82 or 83 when Leisure Dynamics flew the coop. (Bandit)
TDbandit- Platinum Member
- Posts : 897
Join date : 2014-12-01
Age : 52
Location : Riverdale Georgia
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
The Black Widow looks just like mine, and mine is not an estes version (I think). As far as I know (and that's not very far, I admit ), Estes versions had the slit exhaust, non-SPI, Babe Bee style cylinder. Yours is not one of those.
See if the cylinder has a number 1 stamped on it, you should find it under one of the exhaust ports. If there is a number 1, you should have a "real" Black Widow.
See if the cylinder has a number 1 stamped on it, you should find it under one of the exhaust ports. If there is a number 1, you should have a "real" Black Widow.
KariFS- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2004
Join date : 2014-10-10
Age : 52
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
Got a plastic back Black Widow mounted to a Sterling Beginner's Fokker D-VII, given to me by a friend who was moving away back in 1984 or 1985. It has the gray plastic spring "ratchet" starter (one that decreases RPM by 300) like the one in Mark Boesen's photo, except it has the red anodized prop spinner. I think that was pre-Estes. Only other Estes products I bought were 2 Sure Starts for $6.99 in the early 2000's. Those, the compression wasn't the greatest.
I wished that Cox had made a larger .074 Sure Start with exhaust restrictor muffler. Being lighter weight, it might have had better sales. Then again, it might not. Those plastic backs helped to cheapen up production costs, but personally I prefer the metal backs to the plastic ones. I gather by then Leisure Dynamics was slowly on the decline. IMO, the loss of flying fields and people's lack of tolerance for noisy engines, change in attitudes from "healthy noise" to emphasis on self centred awareness, drop in costs for larger foreign engines and big RC spelled the death knell toward small engine aircraft, until the electrics appeared.
Used to go to US national parks where there was considerable absence of people for flying, but with these type activities banned from national parks leaves fewer places to go flying. FAA registration of legitimate modelling activities contrary to US Congressional law makes me wonder if some just want to stomp out what remains of modelling activity in US. With a kid being expelled for building a digital clock thought to be a detonating timer for an IED (improvised explosive device, i.e., home made bomb), seems a movement afoot to dumb down the population.
Sorry for the off-topic rant. I plan to still build and fly until they tell us we can't, just lately seems common sense has all but left the US.
I wished that Cox had made a larger .074 Sure Start with exhaust restrictor muffler. Being lighter weight, it might have had better sales. Then again, it might not. Those plastic backs helped to cheapen up production costs, but personally I prefer the metal backs to the plastic ones. I gather by then Leisure Dynamics was slowly on the decline. IMO, the loss of flying fields and people's lack of tolerance for noisy engines, change in attitudes from "healthy noise" to emphasis on self centred awareness, drop in costs for larger foreign engines and big RC spelled the death knell toward small engine aircraft, until the electrics appeared.
Used to go to US national parks where there was considerable absence of people for flying, but with these type activities banned from national parks leaves fewer places to go flying. FAA registration of legitimate modelling activities contrary to US Congressional law makes me wonder if some just want to stomp out what remains of modelling activity in US. With a kid being expelled for building a digital clock thought to be a detonating timer for an IED (improvised explosive device, i.e., home made bomb), seems a movement afoot to dumb down the population.
Sorry for the off-topic rant. I plan to still build and fly until they tell us we can't, just lately seems common sense has all but left the US.
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5331
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
I'll say that's a 90's Black Widow. Early to mid 90's.
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
Admin wrote:I'll say that's a 90's Black Widow. Early to mid 90's.
Hello, Jacob, I think you may be right. I have an empty Black Widow Box with the familiar later red and black. Instructions in it state copyrighted in 1992. I'm trying now to think of what I did with the motor the Beginner's Fokker came with. Stuff that happened 20+ years ago are getting harder to remember. Might be one of the older (but newer, LOL) Babe Bee's that I have.
I've got another Black Widow, black metal tank and anodized gold crankcase, with the thicker crankcase nose and thicker cylinder. That's an earlier one. There was one I used with my Ace exhaust throttle sleeve, I think that may be the engine, late 1970's. May be I'm wrong, but that I remember. Mounted it on my Airtronics Q-Tee, operated by KRD quick blip sequential throttle on my Ace R/C Pulse Commander with Adams actuator driving the rudder, elevator fixed by a pushrod link with end looped and bolted to fuselage. (Adjustable pushrod clevis allowed elevator trim adjustments.) Flew Q-Tee rudder only with auxiliary throttle (Hi-Med-Lo back to Hi).
I was having 1960's technology fun back in the late 1970's.
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5331
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
Re: Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
hikikomori89 wrote:Hi, I know, the price is much too expensive, but it's a basis, and people have the "make an offer option". But, as a beginner, my first question is : which model is it really? I thank you all !
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/131719273553?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
That is a really nice early version Cox 290 engine, hikikomori89, replacement engine for a Cox ready-to-fly airplane. Mark, I didn't know that the earlier version "Spook" (Fantôme) had an aluminium back. One I got in the very early 1970's had a plastic red back. It was off a Cox turtle deck P-51 with rubber banded wing with integrated plastic landing gear and solid plastic wheels. Another was off a donor L-4 or L-5 Liaison plane (brand new and I wrecked it on first flight back in 1971 or 1972).
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5331
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
I thank you all for those precious infos ;-)
Best regards from France.
hikikomori89- Bronze Member
- Posts : 56
Join date : 2015-10-10
Similar topics
» Cox .020 Engines
» Can anyone identify this?
» Can anyone identify this?
» Need some help to identify this engine
» How to Identify a Tee Dee 049 vs Tee Dee 051
» Can anyone identify this?
» Can anyone identify this?
» Need some help to identify this engine
» How to Identify a Tee Dee 049 vs Tee Dee 051
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum